turtle lake casino concertsFlorida’s November ballot will ask voters whether commercial dog racing — and gambling on it — should be banned in the state.To the supporters of Amendment 13, dog racing is cruel and unnecessary in Florida, but opponents see it as a hidden, creeping extreme animal rights agenda, despite reassurances from the Florida Supreme Court. Most would like nothing more than to decouple themselves from racing and continue with their operations, minus the dogs.The comoany’s shares fell 2.6 percent on the news before recovering slightly.black oak casino concerts 2022He said “No” advocates were pushing the language angle because they had “run out of rational arguments.”“I would never support a ballot measure that was deceptively trying to ban hunting or fishing,” he told Florida Politics. The parent company to Parx Casino, Greenwood Gaming and Entertainment, has submitted plans with the Pennsylvania Gaming Control Board (PGCB) to build a satellite venue in Shippensburg. The parent company to Parx Casino, Greenwood Gaming and Entertainment, has submitted plans with the Pennsylvania Gaming Control Board (PGCB) to build a satellite venue in Shippensburg. fanduel online casino virginia

is harrah s casino in lake tahoe open

free slots 9 linesHe said “No” advocates were pushing the language angle because they had “run out of rational arguments.”“I would never support a ballot measure that was deceptively trying to ban hunting or fishing,” he told Florida Politics. “It’s a gutter tactic for the other side to make up this fantasy argument.”Florida is the hub of greyhound racing in the America. (Image: doubledown casino troubleshootingParx Casino/Shippensburg University/Casino.org)Greenwood won the so-called “mini-casino” license at a February auction with a winning bid of .1 million. viejas casino instagramHe said “No” advocates were pushing the language angle because they had “run out of rational arguments.”“I would never support a ballot measure that was deceptively trying to ban hunting or fishing,” he told Florida Politics. (Image: David Spencer/The Palm Beach Post)On the face of it, the question posed by Amendment 13 is simple enough, but the choice of language included in the amendment has transformed it into one of the most controversial issues on the ballot — and one that appears to transcend traditional Republican and Democratic political divisions.It’s the opening preamble that has caused all the trouble and, as November 6 approaches, the argument has turned toxic.The first sentence of the amendment summary states that “the humane treatment of animals is a fundamental value of the people of thdoubledown casino troubleshootinge State of Florida.”‘Outright Trickeration’The Florida Greyhound Racing Association (FGRA) — backed by a coalition including the Florida Farm Bureau, National Rifle Association and Florida Cattlemen’s Association — believes this statement would enable animal rights groups to sue to ban not just dog racing, but anything from hunting and fishing to cattle pet ownership.The FGRA sued to have the measure wiped off the ballot and was briefly successful.In early August, lower court judge Karen Gievers ordered it off the ballot, ruling the offending sentence would mislead voters, and branded it “outright ‘trickeration.’ ”But a month later, the State Supreme Court ordered it back by a count of six to one.“Amendment 13’s fundamental value provision is devoid of any legislative or judicial mandate: it bestows no rights, imposes no duties, and does not empower the Legislature to take any action,” ruled the court.Despite the ruling suggesting their fears are overblown, opponents to Amendment 13 are still not satisfied.“Animal rights leaders are in a panic,” claimed Sunshine State News columnist Marrion P Hammer in an op-ed on Tuesday. The state hosts 12 of 19 fully operational tracks nationwide, with around 8,000 dogs housed at track kennel compounds across the state, according to figures provided by activist group GREY2K.Ironically, many of the state’s pari-mutuel dog tracks actually support the proposed ban. call the kansas star casino

hallmark casino hack

bet n spin casino no deposit bonusThe state hosts 12 of 19 fully operational tracks nationwide, with around 8,000 dogs housed at track kennel compounds across the state, according to figures provided by activist group GREY2K.Ironically, many of the state’s pari-mutuel dog tracks actually support the proposed ban. Parx Casino wants to bring gambling to the Pennsylvania town of Shippensburg. But it fell short of analysts’ expectations of 9 percent climb in earnings. The parent company to Parx Casino, Greenwood Gaming and Entertainment, has submitted plans with the Pennsylvania Gaming Control Board (PGCB) to build a satellite venue in Shippensburg. (Image: David Spencer/The Palm Beach Post)On the face of it, the question posed by Amendment 13 is simple enough, but the choice of language included in the amendment has transformed it into one of the most controversial issues on the ballot — and one that appears to transcend traditional Republican and Democratic political divisions.It’s the opening preamble that has caused all the trouble and, as November 6 approaches, the argument has turned toxic.The first sentence of the amendment summary states that “the humane treatment of animals is a fundamental value of the people of thdoubledown casino troubleshootinge State of Florida.”‘Outright Trickeration’The Florida Greyhound Racing Association (FGRA) — backed by a coalition including the Florida Farm Bureau, National Rifle Association and Florida Cattlemen’s Association — believes this statement would enable animal rights groups to sue to ban not just dog racing, but anything from hunting and fishing to cattle pet ownership.The FGRA sued to have the measure wiped off the ballot and was briefly successful.In early August, lower court judge Karen Gievers ordered it off the ballot, ruling the offending sentence would mislead voters, and branded it “outright ‘trickeration.’ ”But a month later, the State Supreme Court ordered it back by a count of six to one.“Amendment 13’s fundamental value provision is devoid of any legislative or judicial mandate: it bestows no rights, imposes no duties, and does not empower the Legislature to take any action,” ruled the court.Despite the ruling suggesting their fears are overblown, opponents to Amendment 13 are still not satisfied.“Animal rights leaders are in a panic,” claimed Sunshine State News columnist Marrion P Hammer in an op-ed on Tuesday. Most would like nothing more than to decouple themselves from racing and continue with their operations, minus the dogs.cashman casino aristocrat