free slot games quick hitsSteven J. MGM Resort’s proposal to build a large casino in Bridgeport, Connecticut — already opposed by many surrounding towns — is now facing a new challenge, with word that the Constitution State’s new Governor Ned Lamont, only in office two weeks, has reached out to the tribes that operate Foxwoods Resort Casino and Mohegan Sun for ideas on opening a new gaming venue in Bridgeport. Anne Hughes (D-Easton) said in a statement to Casino.org, also warning about the social costs of gambling in general and problem gambling specifically.Traffic ArgumentsMuch of the long-standing opposition to a casino in Bridgeport from surrounding communities is caused by the anticipation of additional traffic on the area’s already congested highways.“We have afree slot games bier haus“A casino could be in the mix, but nothing’s been decided. (Image: ctnewsjunkie.com)Lamont asked the chairmen of the Mashantucket Pequot and Mohegan tribes to consider developing some kind of gaming facility in Bridgeport, according to Mohegan Chairman Kevin Brown.We’ve had discussions, primarily based on our government-to-government relations,” Brown told Connecticut’s The Day newspaper. Steven J. raging bull casino app

twin river casino sports book app

harrah s casino rincon“A casino could be in the mix, but nothing’s been decided. “During those discussions, [Governor Lamont] asked, ‘Would you be interested in looking into Bridgeport?'”Brown said that if the tribes got behind a Bridgeport project, it wouldn’t necessarily be a casino resort, however.“That’s our primary business mocasino w pokerdel, but there could be other things that involve gaming, betting, and the entertainment world,” Brown told the New London-based news site. “We hope to get to a place where everyone can agree, and I think we can.”raging bull casino free no deposit bonus codes 2021The spectrum is wide open.”Who’s on First?The Mohegan chair said he and Rodney Butler — who serves as the Mashantucket chairman — have discussed Bridgeport on two occasions with Lamont.Last year, Casino.org reported that the two Native American tribes said they have no interest in being part of a process to build a casino in Bridgeport.On the other hand, MGM Resorts International, which recently opened MGM Springfield in Massachusetts, wants to build a 5 million casino on the Bridgeport waterfront.Several of the state’s legislators — all located in and near Bridgeport — offered mixed reaction to the possible involvement of the tribes in a potential casino.The Bridgeport Legislative delegation has always been willing to listen to and work with anyone interested in bringing jobs and economic opportunity to Bridgeport,” State Rep. We’ve reassured them that we’re not interested in harming that interest or jeopardizing tribal compacts.“There’s no reason to shut out the rest of the state and the rest of the potential consumers and players and operators from taking part in a perfectly safe and legal business,” he added. Stafstrom (D-Bridgeport) told Casino.org.“That is why we have pushed for an open, transparent, competitive bidding process so that any interested gaming operator would have the opportunity to bid and present a package that makes the most sense for Bridgeport and the State of Connecticut,” he added.“To date, MGM has been the most outspoken on the potential Bridgeport offers and has presented plans for a robustcasino w poker entertainment destination. casino grand bay 65 no deposit bonus

used casino slot machine for sale

reset cashman casino iphone“The tribes obviously have a leg up in this regard.”“The tribes have over 6,000 jobs in Connecticut, generate about 0 million for the state … for the compact,” State Sen. “We’re talking about thousands of jobs and important revenue.”But concerns about the regional and local negative impact from any casino opening up in Bridgeport still linger.State Rep. “The tribes obviously have a leg up in this regard.”“The tribes have over 6,000 jobs in Connecticut, generate about 0 million for the state … for the compact,” State Sen. Anne Hughes (D-Easton) said in a statement to Casino.org, also warning about the social costs of gambling in general and problem gambling specifically.Traffic ArgumentsMuch of the long-standing opposition to a casino in Bridgeport from surrounding communities is caused by the anticipation of additional traffic on the area’s already congested highways.“We have aConnecticut’s new governor, Ned Lamont, is in talks with two state tribes about possible gaming offerings. The spectrum is wide open.”Who’s on First?The Mohegan chair said he and Rodney Butler — who serves as the Mashantucket chairman — have discussed Bridgeport on two occasions with Lamont.Last year, Casino.org reported that the two Native American tribes said they have no interest in being part of a process to build a casino in Bridgeport.On the other hand, MGM Resorts International, which recently opened MGM Springfield in Massachusetts, wants to build a 5 million casino on the Bridgeport waterfront.Several of the state’s legislators — all located in and near Bridgeport — offered mixed reaction to the possible involvement of the tribes in a potential casino.The Bridgeport Legislative delegation has always been willing to listen to and work with anyone interested in bringing jobs and economic opportunity to Bridgeport,” State Rep. four winds casino indiana