coolcat casino sign in“During those discussions, [Governor Lamont] asked, ‘Would you be interested in looking into Bridgeport?'”Brown said that if the tribes got behind a Bridgeport project, it wouldn’t necessarily be a casino resort, however.“That’s our primary business mocasino w pokerdel, but there could be other things that involve gaming, betting, and the entertainment world,” Brown told the New London-based news site. (Image: ctnewsjunkie.com)Lamont asked the chairmen of the Mashantucket Pequot and Mohegan tribes to consider developing some kind of gaming facility in Bridgeport, according to Mohegan Chairman Kevin Brown.We’ve had discussions, primarily based on our government-to-government relations,” Brown told Connecticut’s The Day newspaper. “A casino could be in the mix, but nothing’s been decided. free online joker poker slots“We hope to get to a place where everyone can agree, and I think we can.”We’ve reassured them that we’re not interested in harming that interest or jeopardizing tribal compacts.“There’s no reason to shut out the rest of the state and the rest of the potential consumers and players and operators from taking part in a perfectly safe and legal business,” he added. “We hope to get to a place where everyone can agree, and I think we can.”nugget casino reno events

wild casino payout reviews

cliff castle casino restaurants“During those discussions, [Governor Lamont] asked, ‘Would you be interested in looking into Bridgeport?'”Brown said that if the tribes got behind a Bridgeport project, it wouldn’t necessarily be a casino resort, however.“That’s our primary business mocasino w pokerdel, but there could be other things that involve gaming, betting, and the entertainment world,” Brown told the New London-based news site. Stafstrom (D-Bridgeport) told Casino.org.“That is why we have pushed for an open, transparent, competitive bidding process so that any interested gaming operator would have the opportunity to bid and present a package that makes the most sense for Bridgeport and the State of Connecticut,” he added.“To date, MGM has been the most outspoken on the potential Bridgeport offers and has presented plans for a robustcasino w poker entertainment destination. We’ve reassured them that we’re not interested in harming that interest or jeopardizing tribal compacts.“There’s no reason to shut out the rest of the state and the rest of the potential consumers and players and operators from taking part in a perfectly safe and legal business,” he added. live casino appstand that. The spectrum is wide open.”Who’s on First?The Mohegan chair said he and Rodney Butler — who serves as the Mashantucket chairman — have discussed Bridgeport on two occasions with Lamont.Last year, Casino.org reported that the two Native American tribes said they have no interest in being part of a process to build a casino in Bridgeport.On the other hand, MGM Resorts International, which recently opened MGM Springfield in Massachusetts, wants to build a 5 million casino on the Bridgeport waterfront.Several of the state’s legislators — all located in and near Bridgeport — offered mixed reaction to the possible involvement of the tribes in a potential casino.The Bridgeport Legislative delegation has always been willing to listen to and work with anyone interested in bringing jobs and economic opportunity to Bridgeport,” State Rep. We’ve reassured them that we’re not interested in harming that interest or jeopardizing tribal compacts.“There’s no reason to shut out the rest of the state and the rest of the potential consumers and players and operators from taking part in a perfectly safe and legal business,” he added. turtle creek casino near me

chukchansi casino free play

club player casino downloadstand that. Bob Duff, (D-Norwalk), who is majority leader of the State Senate, told Casino.org. Anne Hughes (D-Easton) said in a statement to Casino.org, also warning about the social costs of gambling in general and problem gambling specifically.Traffic ArgumentsMuch of the long-standing opposition to a casino in Bridgeport from surrounding communities is caused by the anticipation of additional traffic on the area’s already congested highways.“We have a“We’re talking about thousands of jobs and important revenue.”But concerns about the regional and local negative impact from any casino opening up in Bridgeport still linger.State Rep. “We hope to get to a place where everyone can agree, and I think we can.”We’ve reassured them that we’re not interested in harming that interest or jeopardizing tribal compacts.“There’s no reason to shut out the rest of the state and the rest of the potential consumers and players and operators from taking part in a perfectly safe and legal business,” he added. g casino blackjack