oxford casino numberWe’ve reassured them that we’re not interested in harming that interest or jeopardizing tribal compacts.“There’s no reason to shut out the rest of the state and the rest of the potential consumers and players and operators from taking part in a perfectly safe and legal business,” he added. “The tribes obviously have a leg up in this regard.”“The tribes have over 6,000 jobs in Connecticut, generate about 0 million for the state … for the compact,” State Sen. The spectrum is wide open.”Who’s on First?The Mohegan chair said he and Rodney Butler — who serves as the Mashantucket chairman — have discussed Bridgeport on two occasions with Lamont.Last year, Casino.org reported that the two Native American tribes said they have no interest in being part of a process to build a casino in Bridgeport.On the other hand, MGM Resorts International, which recently opened MGM Springfield in Massachusetts, wants to build a 5 million casino on the Bridgeport waterfront.Several of the state’s legislators — all located in and near Bridgeport — offered mixed reaction to the possible involvement of the tribes in a potential casino.The Bridgeport Legislative delegation has always been willing to listen to and work with anyone interested in bringing jobs and economic opportunity to Bridgeport,” State Rep. w casino slots(Image: ctnewsjunkie.com)Lamont asked the chairmen of the Mashantucket Pequot and Mohegan tribes to consider developing some kind of gaming facility in Bridgeport, according to Mohegan Chairman Kevin Brown.We’ve had discussions, primarily based on our government-to-government relations,” Brown told Connecticut’s The Day newspaper. We look forward to the tribes’ putting forward their proposal as well,” Stafstrom said.Money TalksOne concern with the MGM proposal is what may happen to the money — which totals about 0 million per year — the tribes give to Connecticut from slot machine revenue, if a competitor opens up elsewhere in the state.Betsy Conway, general counsel for the Mashantucket Pequots, has said that payments from the tribes to the state would end the moment the state authorized a commercial casino, even before that venue opened. “We hope to get to a place where everyone can agree, and I think we can.”winstar world casino win lob statement

four winds casino near me

wynn rooms las vegasMGM Resort’s proposal to build a large casino in Bridgeport, Connecticut — already opposed by many surrounding towns — is now facing a new challenge, with word that the Constitution State’s new Governor Ned Lamont, only in office two weeks, has reached out to the tribes that operate Foxwoods Resort Casino and Mohegan Sun for ideas on opening a new gaming venue in Bridgeport. Steven J. “We hope to get to a place where everyone can agree, and I think we can.”kansas star casino valentine s daySteven J. We’ve reassured them that we’re not interested in harming that interest or jeopardizing tribal compacts.“There’s no reason to shut out the rest of the state and the rest of the potential consumers and players and operators from taking part in a perfectly safe and legal business,” he added. stand that. las atlantis casino group

choctaw casino near me

bellagio casino 1Thomas O’Dea (R-New Canaan) told Casino.org that he is “ … not a fan generally of having casinos coming in anywhere.” He cites the example of Atlantic City, where, O’Dea claims, that “casinos … didresorts casino in atlantic city new jersey nothing for the community.”“I am concerned about expansion of casinos in Connecticut, especially in Bridgeport,” State Rep. stand that. We look forward to the tribes’ putting forward their proposal as well,” Stafstrom said.Money TalksOne concern with the MGM proposal is what may happen to the money — which totals about 0 million per year — the tribes give to Connecticut from slot machine revenue, if a competitor opens up elsewhere in the state.Betsy Conway, general counsel for the Mashantucket Pequots, has said that payments from the tribes to the state would end the moment the state authorized a commercial casino, even before that venue opened. “We hope to get to a place where everyone can agree, and I think we can.”We’ve reassured them that we’re not interested in harming that interest or jeopardizing tribal compacts.“There’s no reason to shut out the rest of the state and the rest of the potential consumers and players and operators from taking part in a perfectly safe and legal business,” he added. “We’re talking about thousands of jobs and important revenue.”But concerns about the regional and local negative impact from any casino opening up in Bridgeport still linger.State Rep. seminole casino craps