mgm 678 casino“It’s a gutter tactic for the other side to make up this fantasy argument.”Florida is the hub of greyhound racing in the America. Florida’s November ballot will ask voters whether commercial dog racing — and gambling on it — should be banned in the state.To the supporters of Amendment 13, dog racing is cruel and unnecessary in Florida, but opponents see it as a hidden, creeping extreme animal rights agenda, despite reassurances from the Florida Supreme Court. We believe our concession is not at risk,” he added.LVS reported earnings of 9 million in Q3, up 2.2 percent on the corresponding period last year. does ocean downs casino have table gamesThe parent company to Parx Casino, Greenwood Gaming and Entertainment, has submitted plans with the Pennsylvania Gaming Control Board (PGCB) to build a satellite venue in Shippensburg. Most would like nothing more than to decouple themselves from racing and continue with their operations, minus the dogs.“Their attempt to use hidden words to establish a legal foothold in the Florida Constitution that they can use to bring lawsuits to ban legitimate activities, like hunting, fishing and farming activities has been exposed.“They don’t want people to realize that greyhound racing is camouflage designed to help hide theirsanta ana star casino winners complete agenda.”‘Gutter Tactics’Marty Irby who identifies as a “hardcore conservative,” according to the Tampa Bay Times, is head of Animal Wellness Action, which has heavily supported “Yes” on 13. online gambling kerala

drake casino complaints

when is black hawk casinos going to openThe company selected a 15-mile radius centered along Interstate 81 between Chambersburg and Carlisle.Parx’s plans, if approved by state gaming regulators and local officials, would put the satellite casino just outside Shippensburg Township on a 10-acre plot of land. The company selected a 15-mile radius centered along Interstate 81 between Chambersburg and Carlisle.Parx’s plans, if approved by state gaming regulators and local officials, would put the satellite casino just outside Shippensburg Township on a 10-acre plot of land. “Their attempt to use hidden words to establish a legal foothold in the Florida Constitution that they can use to bring lawsuits to ban legitimate activities, like hunting, fishing and farming activities has been exposed.“They don’t want people to realize that greyhound racing is camouflage designed to help hide theirsanta ana star casino winners complete agenda.”‘Gutter Tactics’Marty Irby who identifies as a “hardcore conservative,” according to the Tampa Bay Times, is head of Animal Wellness Action, which has heavily supported “Yes” on 13. lucky creek casino codesThe Patriot-News reports that the casino initially plans to include“It’s a gutter tactic for the other side to make up this fantasy argument.”Florida is the hub of greyhound racing in the America. The state hosts 12 of 19 fully operational tracks nationwide, with around 8,000 dogs housed at track kennel compounds across the state, according to figures provided by activist group GREY2K.Ironically, many of the state’s pari-mutuel dog tracks actually support the proposed ban. intertops casino red no deposit bonus codes

wild casino slots

doubledown casino slot(Image: David Spencer/The Palm Beach Post)On the face of it, the question posed by Amendment 13 is simple enough, but the choice of language included in the amendment has transformed it into one of the most controversial issues on the ballot — and one that appears to transcend traditional Republican and Democratic political divisions.It’s the opening preamble that has caused all the trouble and, as November 6 approaches, the argument has turned toxic.The first sentence of the amendment summary states that “the humane treatment of animals is a fundamental value of the people of thsanta ana star casino winnerse State of Florida.”‘Outright Trickeration’The Florida Greyhound Racing Association (FGRA) — backed by a coalition including the Florida Farm Bureau, National Rifle Association and Florida Cattlemen’s Association — believes this statement would enable animal rights groups to sue to ban not just dog racing, but anything from hunting and fishing to cattle pet ownership.The FGRA sued to have the measure wiped off the ballot and was briefly successful.In early August, lower court judge Karen Gievers ordered it off the ballot, ruling the offending sentence would mislead voters, and branded it “outright ‘trickeration.’ ”But a month later, the State Supreme Court ordered it back by a count of six to one.“Amendment 13’s fundamental value provision is devoid of any legislative or judicial mandate: it bestows no rights, imposes no duties, and does not empower the Legislature to take any action,” ruled the court.Despite the ruling suggesting their fears are overblown, opponents to Amendment 13 are still not satisfied.“Animal rights leaders are in a panic,” claimed Sunshine State News columnist Marrion P Hammer in an op-ed on Tuesday. f Macau, we’ve been wildly successful and our billion statement in the call to bring The Londoner to fruition … is proof positive that actions speak louder than words.“If there’s not a vote of confidence in that, I don’t know what is. (Image: David Spencer/The Palm Beach Post)On the face of it, the question posed by Amendment 13 is simple enough, but the choice of language included in the amendment has transformed it into one of the most controversial issues on the ballot — and one that appears to transcend traditional Republican and Democratic political divisions.It’s the opening preamble that has caused all the trouble and, as November 6 approaches, the argument has turned toxic.The first sentence of the amendment summary states that “the humane treatment of animals is a fundamental value of the people of thsanta ana star casino winnerse State of Florida.”‘Outright Trickeration’The Florida Greyhound Racing Association (FGRA) — backed by a coalition including the Florida Farm Bureau, National Rifle Association and Florida Cattlemen’s Association — believes this statement would enable animal rights groups to sue to ban not just dog racing, but anything from hunting and fishing to cattle pet ownership.The FGRA sued to have the measure wiped off the ballot and was briefly successful.In early August, lower court judge Karen Gievers ordered it off the ballot, ruling the offending sentence would mislead voters, and branded it “outright ‘trickeration.’ ”But a month later, the State Supreme Court ordered it back by a count of six to one.“Amendment 13’s fundamental value provision is devoid of any legislative or judicial mandate: it bestows no rights, imposes no duties, and does not empower the Legislature to take any action,” ruled the court.Despite the ruling suggesting their fears are overblown, opponents to Amendment 13 are still not satisfied.“Animal rights leaders are in a panic,” claimed Sunshine State News columnist Marrion P Hammer in an op-ed on Tuesday. But it fell short of analysts’ expectations of 9 percent climb in earnings. He said “No” advocates were pushing the language angle because they had “run out of rational arguments.”“I would never support a ballot measure that was deceptively trying to ban hunting or fishing,” he told Florida Politics. Parx Casino wants to bring gambling to the Pennsylvania town of Shippensburg. caesars palace casino hours