free slots unicorn“The tribes obviously have a leg up in this regard.”“The tribes have over 6,000 jobs in Connecticut, generate about 0 million for the state … for the compact,” State Sen. Anne Hughes (D-Easton) said in a statement to Casino.org, also warning about the social costs of gambling in general and problem gambling specifically.Traffic ArgumentsMuch of the long-standing opposition to a casino in Bridgeport from surrounding communities is caused by the anticipation of additional traffic on the area’s already congested highways.“We have a“During those discussions, [Governor Lamont] asked, ‘Would you be interested in looking into Bridgeport?'”Brown said that if the tribes got behind a Bridgeport project, it wouldn’t necessarily be a casino resort, however.“That’s our primary business mofree v slots gamesdel, but there could be other things that involve gaming, betting, and the entertainment world,” Brown told the New London-based news site. chumba casino accountAnne Hughes (D-Easton) said in a statement to Casino.org, also warning about the social costs of gambling in general and problem gambling specifically.Traffic ArgumentsMuch of the long-standing opposition to a casino in Bridgeport from surrounding communities is caused by the anticipation of additional traffic on the area’s already congested highways.“We have aWe’ve reassured them that we’re not interested in harming that interest or jeopardizing tribal compacts.“There’s no reason to shut out the rest of the state and the rest of the potential consumers and players and operators from taking part in a perfectly safe and legal business,” he added. Bob Duff, (D-Norwalk), who is majority leader of the State Senate, told Casino.org. kansas star casino venue

oxford casino roulette

owner of thunder valley casinoThomas O’Dea (R-New Canaan) told Casino.org that he is “ … not a fan generally of having casinos coming in anywhere.” He cites the example of Atlantic City, where, O’Dea claims, that “casinos … didfree v slots games nothing for the community.”“I am concerned about expansion of casinos in Connecticut, especially in Bridgeport,” State Rep. “We hope to get to a place where everyone can agree, and I think we can.”“A casino could be in the mix, but nothing’s been decided. blackjack casino machine“The tribes obviously have a leg up in this regard.”“The tribes have over 6,000 jobs in Connecticut, generate about 0 million for the state … for the compact,” State Sen. The spectrum is wide open.”Who’s on First?The Mohegan chair said he and Rodney Butler — who serves as the Mashantucket chairman — have discussed Bridgeport on two occasions with Lamont.Last year, Casino.org reported that the two Native American tribes said they have no interest in being part of a process to build a casino in Bridgeport.On the other hand, MGM Resorts International, which recently opened MGM Springfield in Massachusetts, wants to build a 5 million casino on the Bridgeport waterfront.Several of the state’s legislators — all located in and near Bridgeport — offered mixed reaction to the possible involvement of the tribes in a potential casino.The Bridgeport Legislative delegation has always been willing to listen to and work with anyone interested in bringing jobs and economic opportunity to Bridgeport,” State Rep. “We hope to get to a place where everyone can agree, and I think we can.”seven feathers casino in oregon

e casanova

foxwoods online casino app“We hope to get to a place where everyone can agree, and I think we can.”Anne Hughes (D-Easton) said in a statement to Casino.org, also warning about the social costs of gambling in general and problem gambling specifically.Traffic ArgumentsMuch of the long-standing opposition to a casino in Bridgeport from surrounding communities is caused by the anticipation of additional traffic on the area’s already congested highways.“We have aThe spectrum is wide open.”Who’s on First?The Mohegan chair said he and Rodney Butler — who serves as the Mashantucket chairman — have discussed Bridgeport on two occasions with Lamont.Last year, Casino.org reported that the two Native American tribes said they have no interest in being part of a process to build a casino in Bridgeport.On the other hand, MGM Resorts International, which recently opened MGM Springfield in Massachusetts, wants to build a 5 million casino on the Bridgeport waterfront.Several of the state’s legislators — all located in and near Bridgeport — offered mixed reaction to the possible involvement of the tribes in a potential casino.The Bridgeport Legislative delegation has always been willing to listen to and work with anyone interested in bringing jobs and economic opportunity to Bridgeport,” State Rep. We’ve reassured them that we’re not interested in harming that interest or jeopardizing tribal compacts.“There’s no reason to shut out the rest of the state and the rest of the potential consumers and players and operators from taking part in a perfectly safe and legal business,” he added. “We hope to get to a place where everyone can agree, and I think we can.”Connecticut’s new governor, Ned Lamont, is in talks with two state tribes about possible gaming offerings. riversweeps online casino 777